Top Spin Blog » Rafael Nadal

Can Fish Turnaround the Spanish Beatdown of American Players?

Joe Samuel Starnes — Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:08:10 +0000

The matches between Spanish players and Americans at Wimbledon have been rough for the home team: Andy Roddick lost to Feliciano Lopez in straight sets. John Isner lost to Nicholas Almalgro in four. Michael Russell and Ryan Sweeting both lost to Rafael Nadal in three. Ryan Harrison lost to David Ferrer in five sets.

Americans are 0-5 against Spanish players at Wimbledon. Times have changed with players from a red clay court country dominate the Americans on grass. If only Roddick and Isner could have had a shot in the nineties when all it took was an unreturnable serve to reach the finals (remember Krajicek and Ivanisevic?) where you lost to Pete Sampras.

This year there were only nine Americans in the draw; the only three Americans to lose to players not from the Iberian Peninsula were James Blake (remember him?), Donald Young (and him?), and Alex Bogomolov.

But there’s one match set for Wednesday that could make up for all of it. Mardy Fish, making a strong showing beating Tomas Berdych on Monday to reach the quarters, goes up against number one seed Nadal. A Fish win would be huge, not only his biggest win ever, but it would give the Americans some positive momentum heading into the July 8-10 Davis Cup matchup between the two countries in Austin, Texas.

Fish is 0-5 in his career against Nadal, but the way he’s playing, don’t count him out.

See You in Texas — U.S. Will Try to Avenge 0-6 Wimbledon Singles Record Against Spanish in Davis Cup With Mardy Fish’s quarterfinal loss to Rafael Nadal, the American...
U.S. versus Spain: 0-9 Zero to nine. The number says it all. That is...
Two, Count’em, Two American Men in U.S. Open Quarters It’s been quite a long time since two American men...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Spain Continues Conquest of the Tennis World

Joe Samuel Starnes — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:39:28 +0000

Perhaps I’m writing a blog about men’s tennis in the wrong language. Spain on Saturday won their fourth Davis Cup in this decade, securing their grasp on the claim on the world’s best tennis country of this century. When you consider the Davis Cup quartet combined with the year-end rankings of nine players in the world’s top 50, no other country comes close on the netted rectangle.

Spanish players ranked are Nadal at 2 (who Pete Bodo nominated for Davis Cup player of the decade); Verdasco 9; Robredo 16; Ferrer 18; Juan Carlos Ferrero 23; and Nicholas Almagro 26; Albert Montanes 31; Guillermo Garcia-Lopez 41; and Feliciano Lopez 47. For comparison, the US has four in top 50; only France comes close with six, and Gasquet lurking right outside top 50 at 52.

U.S. versus Spain: 0-9 Zero to nine. The number says it all. That is...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Media Jinx Knocking Down Nadal?

Joe Samuel Starnes — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:57:59 +0000

First there was the S.L. Price piece in Sports Illustrated detailing “How Rafael Nadal Humbled Federer” that ran in the magazine the third week of May. On May 17, of course, while the magazine made its way to mailboxes, Federer beat Nadal 4 and 4 in the finals at Madrid. A few weeks later Federer won the French Open to have John McEnroe and others declare him the greatest of all time (and also make the Sports Illustrated cover on June 15).

Also in May, the Men’s Journal cover article on Nadal appeared, and this past Sunday, two days after Nadal pulled out of Wimbledon, he made the cover of the Sunday New York Times magazine (coincidentally, both articles begin with a scene from Nadal’s win over David Nalbandian in Indian Wells).

I don’t believe in jinxes — if anything, these are testament to the ridiculously long lead times that magazines require for their copy. At the moment that Federer is poised for the Grand Slam record, it’s his injured rival getting much of the premier press.

But maybe do jinxes do exist. All they hype and coverage for the Centre Court roof, and it hasn’t rained yet (perhaps it’s similar to the likelihood of rain decreasing whenever I remember to take an umbrella).

In other roof news, UK’s star player Andy Murray has condemned its long shadow. Surely there was a better way for Wimbledon to spend 100 million pounds.

Can Fish Turnaround the Spanish Beatdown of American Players? The matches between Spanish players and Americans at Wimbledon have...
Nadal To Skip Davis Cup in Texas This shouldn’t surprise anyone who has followed Davis Cup for...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Are You Ready for a Grand Slam? Nadal Poised to Achieve “Hardest of All” Tennis Feat

Joe Samuel Starnes — Sat, 16 May 2009 14:40:12 +0000

Roger Federer, pictured here after the Australian Open final, is clearly not, but Rafael Nadal, talking with the last man to complete a Grand Slam, Rod Laver, is poised to win all four majors this year. Nadal has already won in Melbourne, is a heavy favorite to win the French, proved last year that he can win Wimbledon, and showed by winning the Australian Open and Indian Wells this year that he can win on hardcourts, the New York surface where the Grand Slam season ends in September.

Only one man other than Laver has won the true Grand Slam, meaning the four majors in order, and that was American Don Budge in 1938. (Three other players hold “career slams,” meaning they have won all four but not in order — Fred Perry, Roy Emerson, and Andre Agassi.) The term Grand Slam originated, according to Bud Collins’ indispensable and encyclopedic History of Tennis, in 1933 when Australian Jack Crawford won the first three legs and sought the U.S. championship. Collins wrote: “The prospect of his winning that one, too, intrigued a New York Times columnist, John Kieran. If he did, wrote Kieran, it would be something like a ’grand slam’ in bridge.” Crawford lost in a grueling five-setter in the final to Perry, including a second set by the pre-tiebreaker days score of 11-13, but the Grand Slam was born.

Laver in his 1973 memoir The Education of a Tennis Player (the prose of which bears the hyperbolic stamp of Collins, his collaborator) wrote: “I like to think the tennis Slam is the hardest of all because you have to get your game up to the top level four times over an eight-month stretch, and of course your’e playing other tournaments in between, too. Much travel and changing conditions are involved. In 1969, I started in the tropical summer heat of Brisbane and wound up in the autumn rain of New York.”

And those varying conditions are even more varied now. When Laver won his Grand Slams — as an amateur in 1962 and in the Open professional era of 1969 — only the French was not played on grass. Today, there are two on hard courts, the fast courts of Flushing Meadows and the slower blue hard courts of Melbourne, as well as the red clay of Paris and the grass of Wimbledon. The modern Grand Slam is as difficult as it has ever been.

Nadal has a long way to go, with the two most difficult for him coming last, but if he pulls it off, he’ll have to rank atop the list in the perpetual argument of who is tennis GOAT — the greatest of all time.

Sorry, Roger.

Greatest Tennis Player of All Time? Roger, Of Course, Despite the Fact I’ve Beaten Him 17 Times The GOAT discussion reached its most ludicrous point yesterday when...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.